From Manuscript to Milestone: Mastering Addiction Research Publishing
Episode Overview
Read journal instructions carefully to avoid common pitfalls. View reviewer feedback as constructive, not personal. Disclose any industry involvement in your research. Use AI as a tool, not a replacement for writing. Respond respectfully to all reviewer comments.
"Even if you get a rejection, that can turn around and you can submit it to the next journal."
Ever wondered what it takes to get your addiction research published? In this episode of 'Addiction Medicine: Beyond the Abstract', Dr. Marcela Smid shares her invaluable tips on navigating the tricky waters of scientific publishing. Recorded at the bustling 56th Annual ASAM Conference in Denver, Dr. Smid breaks down the often daunting submission and peer review process for budding authors. She stresses the importance of meticulously reading journal instructions—because who knew formatting could make or break your paper? Dr.
Smid also discusses the role of reviewers, who volunteer their time to provide critical feedback. Even if you face rejection, she encourages viewing it as an opportunity for growth rather than a personal critique. Shifting gears, Dr. Smid delves into the influence of funding on research quality, highlighting the necessity of transparency in disclosing any industry involvement. She candidly shares her own experiences with industry-funded studies, offering a balanced view on the potential biases that come with it.
The conversation then takes a futuristic turn with a discussion on AI's role in research and writing. Dr. Smid explains how AI can be a handy tool for drafting and visualisation but warns against relying on it entirely. The key takeaway? Use AI wisely, and always disclose its use. Whether you're an aspiring author or just curious about the behind-the-scenes of addiction research, this episode offers a treasure trove of insights and practical advice.
Tune in to learn how to transform your manuscript from a rough draft to a published article and gain a deeper understanding of the scientific publishing landscape.