Center for Neuroscience and Behavior
Center for Neuroscience and Behavior
SEASON 4, EPISODE 4: USING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IN COURT
SEASON 4, EPISODE 4: USING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IN COURT
SEASON 4, EPISODE 4: USING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IN COURT
Tuesday 24th June 2025
Explore the challenges of using scientific evidence in courtrooms with Gustavo Ribeiro in this intriguing episode of 'Lobes and Robes'.
36 minutes
Informative
Engaging
Thought-provoking
Educational
Honest
About this podcast
Author:
Center for Neuroscience and Behavior
Overview:
Categories:
Navigating Intimate Relationships
Mindfulness & Technology in Health
Holistic Health Innovations
Navigating Alcohol Dependency
Understanding Addiction & Recovery
Links:
Visit site
Episodes:
28 (View all)
Do you want to link to this podcast?
Get the buttons here!Science Meets Law: The Courtroom Conundrum
Episode Overview
- Understanding the cultural differences between law and science.
- Challenges courts face in admitting scientific evidence.
- Impact of neuroscience on legal decisions.
- Potential pitfalls of overvaluing scientific testimony.
- Future implications of AI and misinformation in law.
Courts require finality and certainty, while science embraces uncertainty and ongoing revision.
In the captivating world of 'Lobes and Robes', this episode dives into the intricate dance between science and law. Gustavo Ribeiro, an associate professor of law at American University Washington College of Law, takes centre stage as he explores the challenges courts face when using scientific evidence. With humour and insight, Ribeiro reveals how the legal system demands certainty, while science thrives on ongoing exploration and revision.
You might find yourself pondering the curious tug-of-war between these two fields, as courts grapple with admitting reliable scientific testimony and weighing its value. Ribeiro's discussion highlights the different 'cultures' of law and science – where law seeks finality and science embraces uncertainty. He shares fascinating anecdotes from landmark cases like Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, illustrating how judges navigate the tricky waters of scientific reliability.
The conversation also touches on the pitfalls of overvaluing scientific evidence in courtrooms and the perplexing 'battle of experts'. With neuroscience being a hot topic, Ribeiro discusses its promise and pitfalls in legal proceedings. From brain overclaim syndrome to the complexities of translating neuroscience into legal decisions, there's plenty to chew on. If you've ever wondered about the role of DNA evidence or the future of AI in courtrooms, this episode offers a thought-provoking glimpse into what's next.
Whether you're curious about how courts handle scientific evidence or simply enjoy a good debate on legal philosophy, Gustavo Ribeiro’s insights are sure to spark your interest. Why not dive in and see how science and law collide?