Battling for Addiction Science: Insights from Dr. Tom Babor
Episode Overview
Dr. Babor highlights the threats to addiction research due to federal funding cuts. The Addiction Science Defense Network advocates for preserving scientific integrity. Journal editors play a crucial role in speaking out against anti-scientific policies. Gender equity in research is vital for comprehensive scientific studies. Political interference poses significant challenges to addiction science.
"Our listeners here take some inspiration from that message."
Ever wondered what it takes to protect addiction science in the face of political turbulence? This episode of 'Behind the Masthead' offers a gripping conversation with Dr. Tom Babor, a distinguished researcher and Emeritus Professor at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine. Dr. Babor shares his journey from social psychology to addiction research, highlighting the critical threats to addiction publishing and research due to recent federal funding cuts and ideological shifts.
He discusses the profound impact these changes have on addiction science, both in the U.S. and internationally, painting a vivid picture of the challenges faced by researchers today. You'll hear about the Addiction Science Defense Network, an initiative spearheaded by Dr. Babor, which actively works to counteract these threats through advocacy and policy statements. With humour and candour, Dr.
Babor reveals how he navigates the complexities of scientific publishing amid political interference, advocating for the preservation of funding and scientific integrity. The episode also touches on the role of journal editors in leading the charge against anti-scientific policies, encouraging them to speak out and share information. With insights into gender equity in research and the importance of maintaining diversity in scientific studies, this conversation is a call to action for those invested in addiction science.
Curious about how addiction research can thrive despite political challenges? Dive into this episode for a captivating discussion that underscores the resilience and determination required to safeguard scientific truth.