Trish Wood
Trish Wood
mRNA TECH INVENTOR ROBERT MALONE BACKS UP PROF. BYRAM BRIDLE
mRNA TECH INVENTOR ROBERT MALONE BACKS UP PROF. BYRAM BRIDLE
mRNA TECH INVENTOR ROBERT MALONE BACKS UP PROF. BYRAM BRIDLE
Monday 21st June 2021
Dr. Malone and Dr. Bridle tackle vaccine safety concerns, censorship, and ethics in an explosive discussion on public health policies.
156 minutes
Informative
Honest
Eye-opening
Inspiring
Supportive
About this podcast
Author:
Trish Wood
Overview:
Categories:
Sexual Stigmas & Myths
Recovery from Trauma
Cultural Commentary
Sobriety Toolkit
Relationships & Community
Links:
Visit site
Episodes:
302 (View all)
Do you want to link to this podcast?
Get the buttons here!Challenging the Narrative: Vaccine Safety Under Scrutiny
Episode Overview
- Dr. Malone supports Dr. Bridle's concerns about vaccine safety.
- Concerns raised over spike proteins spreading throughout the body.
- Censorship is hindering open scientific discussion.
- Calls for pausing child vaccinations until more data is available.
- Adverse reaction reporting systems are inconsistent.
"Please stop politicising science. The scientific process requires dissent and discussion to arrive at truth."
Get ready to be moved by real-life accounts of those challenging the status quo in vaccine safety discussions. In this gripping episode, Trish Wood hosts a compelling conversation with Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA technology, and Dr. Byram Bridle, an immunologist from Guelph, who bravely address the backlash they've faced for raising concerns about COVID-19 vaccines. The discussion is as much about the science as it is about the societal pressures and censorship surrounding vaccine discourse. Dr.
Malone and Dr. Bridle dive into the nitty-gritty of spike proteins, dosing decisions, and the ethics of vaccinating children without comprehensive risk-benefit analyses. Their candid exchange reveals a landscape where scientific dissent is met with smear campaigns and professional risks, raising questions about the integrity of public health policies. Adding to the dialogue are Canadian doctors Donald Welsh and Jean Marc Benoit, who share their experiences in collecting data on adverse reactions and confronting censorship in the scientific community.
This episode is a wake-up call to reflect on how we handle dissenting voices in science and the importance of preserving open dialogue. Are we too quick to silence voices that challenge mainstream narratives? This episode will leave you pondering the balance between public health imperatives and individual rights. Don't miss out on this eye-opening discussion that champions the need for transparency and critical thinking in these unprecedented times.