Gender, Science, and Justice (feat. Dr. Troy Reopke)Gender, Science, and Justice (feat. Dr. Troy Reopke)
Lobes and Robes
Colin Saldania and Gustavo Ribeiro speak with Dr. Troy Roepke about how rigid, binary views of sex and gender in science spill into medicine and law. The conversation covers gender-affirming hormone therapy, sex as a biological variable, and the real-world harms of biased research for trans people and cis women.
42:18•14 May 2026
Gender, Hormones and the Law: A Candid Conversation with Dr. Troy Roepke
Episode Overview
- Binary ideas of sex and phrases like “biological sex” can distort research and are being used in laws that restrict trans people’s rights and safety.
- Gender-affirming hormone therapy has decades of use, alters brain structure and function in predictable ways, and often improves mood and reduces distress.
- Treating sex as a simple binary in research leads to poor precision, missed mechanisms, and worse health outcomes, especially for cis women.
- Historical and ongoing gender bias in science, including the preference for male animals and male participants, still shapes today’s evidence base.
- Scientists can reduce harmful misuse of their work by using more precise, less gendered language and by working directly with LGBTQIA2S+ communities.
“Queer people are not a model for hormone work, like for endocrinology. If you're going to do the work, do it to our benefit.”
What can we learn from those who have battled addiction to rigid ideas about sex and gender? This episode of Lobes and Robes brings together neuroscience, endocrinology, and law to unpack how scientific language shapes real people’s lives, especially trans people and cis women. Professor Colin Saldania and Dr. Gustavo Ribeiro chat with Dr. Troy Roepke from Rutgers University, whose research on hormones and the brain sits alongside decades of lived experience as an openly queer scientist. Dr.
Roepke explains how terms like “biological sex” and binary categories of male and female have been baked into science and then picked up by lawmakers in ways that harm people. As they put it bluntly, “Queer people are not a model for hormone work, like for endocrinology.
If you're going to do the work, do it to our benefit.” You’ll hear a clear breakdown of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), including puberty blockers, estradiol, and testosterone, and what current studies suggest about their effects on brain structure and mood. Dr. Roepke stresses that GAHT has been used for decades and is often “mental health medicine for a lot of people,” linking body changes to reductions in depression and suicidal thoughts.
The conversation also tackles sex as a biological variable (SABV), why so much historical research excluded females, and how that bias led to unsafe dosing in drugs like Ambien. Dr. Roepke argues that treating sex as a simple binary creates “a lack of precision” in science and worse health outcomes for everyone.
For anyone interested in fair healthcare, evidence-based policy, or how bias in research ripples into justice systems, this is a sharp, accessible listen that keeps circling back to one core issue: if science has the nuance, why isn’t that nuance reaching the people making the rules? And what happens to vulnerable communities until it does?

Do you want to link to this podcast?
Get the buttons here!
More From This Show
The latest episodes from the same podcast.
Related Episodes
Similar episodes from other shows in the catalogue.
