Judgement day and the science of beliefJudgement day and the science of belief
All In The Mind
The world would end on Judgement Day—21 May, 2011. Some people were convinced, others were sceptical. But the science of belief may explain post-truth politics, and why fake news can appear so believable.
30:15•26 Nov 2017
Judgement Day, Certainty and the Science of Belief
Episode Overview
- Strong beliefs often grow from small initial steps, as people justify their early decisions and slide further down one side of the "pyramid".
- Brain research suggests that the internal signal for believing or disbelieving looks similar across people, regardless of what they believe.
- When deeply held beliefs are challenged or disproved, people experience intense cognitive dissonance and may postpone, reinterpret or abandon the belief.
- Different individuals adjust their beliefs along paths of least resistance, depending on which parts of their belief system matter most to them.
- Social media can rapidly spread stories that feel plausible within a group, making it vital to pause and question how easily we accept such claims as true.
“It's amazing what the human brain can believe.”
This episode dives deep into the challenges and triumphs of how human beings come to believe things with absolute certainty. Centred on the failed prediction that Judgement Day would arrive on 21 May 2011, the story follows Harold Camping and his followers, who were sure earthquakes would devastate the planet and God would take the chosen few to heaven. As one believer says, "After you see all the evidence for it, it's like a neatly tight web...
I knew it was right." Host Lynne Malcolm speaks with neuroscientist and documentary co-producer Chris De Maier about the film *Right Between Your Ears* and what it reveals about the science of belief. You’ll hear how "perfectly ordinary" people — a philosophy student, a retail manager, scientists, and Camping’s own daughter — gradually moved from mild curiosity to absolute conviction that the date was set.
Chris explains the "pyramid" analogy from social psychology: at first you’re at the tip, uncertain; once you take a small step towards believing or rejecting an idea, you start justifying that choice, sliding further down one side of the pyramid until turning back becomes incredibly hard. That process, he suggests, doesn’t just shape doomsday beliefs but also feeds polarised debates around Brexit, Donald Trump, climate change and immigration.
You’ll also hear about brain-scanning research showing that the neural difference between believing and disbelieving is similar across people, whether they’re atheists or Christians, and whether the belief is mathematical, ethical or religious.
As Chris puts it, "Once we are very convinced of something, it appears that our brains flag that up in the same way." The episode finishes by looking at cognitive dissonance — that sinking feeling when reality collides with a cherished belief — and how social media can rapidly amplify convincing but false stories.
It’s a frank, sometimes unsettling reminder that "it's amazing what the human brain can believe" and a gentle prompt to ask: how sure are you about the things you’re certain of?

Do you want to link to this podcast?
Get the buttons here!
More From This Show
The latest episodes from the same podcast.
